Suspicious Fixing Indicators in BPL Drop by 80 Percent Due to ACU Measures: BCB

The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) has strongly reiterated its stance in the fight against corruption in cricket, claiming a significant decline in match-fixing–related suspicious indicators in the Bangladesh Premier League (BPL) as a result of stricter monitoring.

In a statement issued on January 11, the BCB said the continuous operations of its Integrity Unit (ACU) have led to an almost 80 percent reduction in suspicious indicators in the BPL compared to previous editions. The board also emphasized that the ACU’s zero-tolerance policy toward corruption will remain firmly in place.

Controversy recently emerged over the ACU’s activities, with franchise Dhaka Capitals alleging that the unit violated protocols by questioning foreign players inside their hotel rooms and even interrogating a batter just before he went out to bat. According to the franchise, such incidents have caused frustration among players and negatively affected them mentally.

However, the BCB has categorically rejected these allegations. The board stated that the BCB Integrity Unit, led by Alex Marshall, has been conducting its routine operations based on credible intelligence and strictly within the framework set by the ICC Integrity Unit. The measures, it said, are part of the board’s broader effort to maintain a zero-tolerance approach and keep the game free from corruption.

The BCB further clarified that the ACU operates in full compliance with the rules and regulations of the ICC Anti-Corruption Unit and that no player’s or franchise’s rights have been violated in the process. According to the board, these strict measures have directly contributed to the sharp decline in suspicious activities in the BPL.

Addressing the specific allegations, the BCB explained that as part of standard integrity procedures, the ACU held private discussions with a number of foreign players regarding their recruitment process, contracts, and remuneration. The board stressed that such confidential meetings do not imply that any of the players involved are guilty or under suspicion.